I agree but I still haven't seen the update in person yet. - PrincessLeia 263.7 #906 12:36PM
The new one looks like its lost 50 lbs too!! - caramiapoohAKAface 1526.8 #53 12:54PM
Im right with you on this Cara! - MagicalLand 385.7 #356 1:57PM
100% agree with 2008. Much better. My 12 year old said now it looks like global warming happened in Disneyland. :) - Tinkerbellmom4 300.1 #627 2:01PM
It's the angle that the picture was taken that makes it look thinner. the first two are head on and the third is a side view. - VeloMouseGirl 549.7 #211 2:30PM
^ Now that there are 2 previous versions of the Matterhorn next to the current Matterhorn, I see what you mean by contrast. Funny that it has "melted" off a few layers, though. - Jacqueline 550.4 #209 3:02PM
I prefer 2012. 2008 looks like a giant macaroon. 2012 looks like the real Matterhorn. - xsdesign
421.7 #312 2:15PM
Looks like the 2012 version lost weight. - VfxGenie
1399.6 #57 3:11PM
I definately prefer the 2008 look. Anyone know why they put the Matterhorn in skinny jeans? - proudcanuck
476.9 #256 12:37PM
I was thinking that also. I believe the pic is just taken from a different angle. - Alicewhoareyou 543.9 #214 12:41PM
I was thinking it was the angle too. I hope. - Mickey82 286.1 #706 2:21PM
Don't know if it's the view in which the pic was taken or what, but the 2012 view the Matterhorn looks smaller. - aladdinfan
12.7 #6226 12:44PM
Global warming is hitting the Matterhorn pretty bad.. - Jaytasmic
373.3 #378 1:03PM
2012 looks like a Dole Whip - PrincessKristin
776.9 #125 1:04PM
I will always prefer the 2008 look. The new one is too skinny! - wickedale
209.2 #1532 1:13PM
Global warmin hit the alps - marvelAVENGER
128.1 #2654 1:58PM
I prefer 2008, but the new look has good energy in person I think that doesn't come through for me in this picture. - MelodyMouse
943.0 #95 3:15PM
I think I like 2008 just because that's what I'm so used to seeing. I can't wait to see the completed updated version in person :) - Jillian
766.1 #131 3:25PM